共享可能减少缓存复制和闲置容量，对内存供应商形成不同于单机扩容的产品用途；需求规模尚待部署证据。

Sharing may reduce cache copies and idle capacity, creating a use distinct from single-server expansion for memory suppliers; demand scale still requires deployment evidence.

节省部分内存或计算的同时，也可能增加交换、布线和软件维护成本，应看完整服务的净收益。

Savings in memory or computation may come with added switching, cabling and software-maintenance costs; the net benefit must be measured at service level.

真实模型、缓存兼容性和访问模式支持足够高的复用。

Real models, cache compatibility and access patterns must support sufficient reuse.

并发争用后的尾延迟、吞吐与功耗仍满足服务要求。

Tail latency, throughput and power under concurrent contention must still meet service requirements.

低复用或高争用使共享收益消失，模块带宽不能代表整体体验。

Low reuse or high contention may eliminate the benefit; module bandwidth does not represent the overall experience.

供货与量产时间未核实，架构演示可能离采购部署仍有距离。

Availability and production timing remain unverified; an architectural demonstration may still be far from procurement and deployment.

客户部署、供货安排及公开可复现实验配置。

Customer deployments, supply arrangements and publicly reproducible test configurations.

复用率、首字响应、尾延迟、整机耗电和总设备成本。

Reuse rate, time to first token, tail latency, full-system power and total equipment cost.